Great Return

The Great Return is the Wheel of Heaven framework's name for the anticipated official arrival of the Elohim on Earth — the event the Raëlian source material is oriented toward, and the moment the corpus reads its comparative work as pointing to. In the source material the return is not unconditional. Humanity must want it; must show enough unification and wisdom to receive advanced knowledge without misusing it; must build the Embassy — also called the Third Temple — on neutral ground in a country with a mild climate; and must guarantee that the Elohim's craft will not be met by military force. When those conditions are met, the source material promises a transfer of roughly 25,000 years of scientific knowledge from the Elohim to the humanity they created.

The name itself is late. The foundational conditions were set out in The Book Which Tells the Truth (1974); the phrase "Great Return" belongs to the message dated 13 December 1997, in which Yahweh writes that "the hour of our Great Return is near." The framework treats the return as the culminating event of the present Age of Apocalypse — the post-1945 period of recovery and disclosure — and as the opening of the Golden Age of Aquarius that follows. Its timing is left open: the source material speaks of imminence without a calendar, and the conditional structure makes the date depend on humanity's response rather than on a fixed hour.

What the source material says

The conditions for the return come from a single passage in The Book Which Tells the Truth, where Yahweh tells Claude Vorilhon what would have to be true before the Elohim arrive openly:

If people on Earth want us to give them the benefit of our experience and help them gain 25,000 years of scientific knowledge, they have to show us that they want to meet us, and above all demonstrate that they deserve it, and that all this can be done without any danger to us. [...] We know that our arrival could improve many things and unite nations, but we have to feel that people really want to see us, and that they are truly starting to unify.

— Yahweh, in Vorilhon, Le Livre qui dit la vérité (1974)

Four terms are folded together here: that humanity genuinely wants the arrival rather than having it imposed; that it is unified and wise enough to receive advanced knowledge responsibly; that the Elohim's craft is safe from military forces — the same passage notes that "human warplanes have tried to chase our crafts, taking us for enemies"; and that it understands who the Elohim are rather than mistaking them for gods or for adversaries. The book adds the fifth, physical condition: the Embassy, a prepared residence on neutral extraterritorial ground where the Elohim can land and stay. The architectural specification belongs to the Embassy entry. What matters for the return is that the building is its precondition, not its consequence — the Elohim will not arrive until there is a place ready to receive them.

The knowledge transfer is fixed at a figure: roughly 25,000 years, the gap the source material places between present terrestrial science and the Elohim's own. That number is close to one precessional Great Year (about 25,772 years on the modern astronomical reckoning) and close to the interval the source material gives for the Elohim's presence on Earth since the original synthesis of life. The framework reads that coincidence as calibration — a project timed to the turning of the sky — rather than as an accident, while noting that the source states the correspondence only in outline.

The phrase "Great Return" enters with the message of 13 December 1997, the twenty-fourth anniversary of the first 1973 contact:

The hour of our Great Return is near, and we will support and protect the most devoted ones among you. [...] May your joy in seeing the approach of our Great Return give you wings to overcome the last obstacles of the journey.

— Yahweh, "Message of the Elohim, December 13th, 1997"

The 1997 message shifts the tone toward proximate expectation and, in the same breath, frees the Embassy from its original site. After repeated Israeli refusals to grant land near Jerusalem, the message authorises the Raëlian Movement to seek extraterritorial status "from all nations on Earth," with Israel keeping a final option. A later message of 6 August 2015 declared the Elohim's protection of Israel withdrawn. The framework records these shifts as part of the source material's own account and takes no position on their political content.

The Wheel of Heaven reading

On the framework's reading the Great Return is the Elohim's own return to a creation now grown up enough to receive them. The original arrival, roughly 25,000 years ago, was one-directional: the Elohim came to an unprepared Earth to synthesise life and shape humanity. The return reverses the relation. It comes to a humanity that has recovered enough of the makers' capabilities — genetics, spaceflight, the reading of its own scriptures — to meet them as something nearer a partner than a subject. The inheritance the source promises, the 25,000 years of knowledge, is the content of that meeting: not a conquest but a handing-over, offered to a species now in a position to accept or decline it.

The Embassy is the hinge of the reading. Because the Elohim will not arrive without a prepared place to receive them, the framework treats the building of that place as the concrete form the return's preconditions take. The Third Temple of the Hebrew prophets and the New Jerusalem that descends in Revelation 21 are read, in the canon, as two older names for the same structure — the residence the Elohim asked humanity to build so that they could land openly and stay. The return is what happens once it stands.

The return also marks a turn in the framework's calendar. The present Age of Apocalypse is, on the canon's reading, the period of recovery and disclosure that opened around 1945 — the stretch in which humanity reacquires the makers' capabilities and their record becomes legible again. The Great Return is the event that closes it: the point at which recovery gives way to open reunion and the Golden Age of Aquarius proper begins. The framework places the return near the Pisces-to-Aquarius transition for that reason, with the exact moment left to depend on whether the preconditions are met.

The returning figure across traditions

The framework reads the Great Return alongside a pattern that recurs across the world's religions: the expectation of a figure who returns or arrives to close one age and open another. It sets these expectations beside the canon while keeping each in its own terms rather than collapsing them into one.

• Jewish tradition awaits the Mashiach (Hebrew māshîaḥ, "anointed one"), the Davidic king whose coming inaugurates the Messianic Age — the ingathering of the exiles, the rebuilding of the Temple, and universal peace, systematised in Maimonides's Mishneh Torah.
• Christian tradition awaits the Parousia (Greek parousia, "arrival, presence"), the Second Coming of Christ, drawn from the Olivet Discourse, Paul's letters, and the Book of Revelation.
• Islamic tradition holds two linked figures: the Mahdi, the guided one who restores justice at the end of days, and the return of Isa (Jesus) to defeat the Dajjāl.
• Buddhist tradition awaits Maitreya, the future Buddha who appears once the present teaching has been forgotten and restores it.
• Hindu tradition awaits Kalki, the tenth and final avatar of Vishnu, who ends the Kali Yuga and opens a new age.
• Zoroastrian tradition, among the oldest of these, awaits the Saoshyant, the "bringer of benefit" who inaugurates the Frashokereti, the renovation of the world.

The framework's claim is that these expectations preserve, in the vocabulary each tradition had to hand, an awareness of the same anticipated event — the Elohim's return. It is careful about the strength of that claim. The traditions differ from one another in ways that matter: a returning Davidic king is not a future Buddha, and neither is a resurrected saviour. The framework does not flatten those differences or insist that every return-figure is a direct memory of the same thing. What it offers, as interpretation rather than as demonstration, is that the recurrence of the pattern across cultures separated by great distance and time is better read as convergence on a real expectation than as coincidence. The broader cross-tradition case is developed in the List of prophets and religions, and the precessional shape of the sleeping king who wakes — Kronos, Saturn, the Once and Future King — is treated alongside the Return in Hamlet's Mill.

Critical perspectives

The framework's reading is its own, and neither mainstream scholarship nor the traditions it draws on makes it. Mainstream Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and the rest read their return-figures theologically, not as memories of an extraterrestrial arrival, and none accepts the identification of a Raëlian Embassy with the Third Temple or the New Jerusalem. Academic study of the eschatological literature — the messianism of Gershom Scholem and Moshe Idel, the Mahdi scholarship of Abdulaziz Sachedina and David Cook, the Zoroastrian work of Mary Boyce and Anders Hultgård — reads these expectations in their own historical settings. The entry presents the Return as canon rather than as consensus, and leaves the two standing side by side.

The most serious objection the framework takes on is the contact-impact question: whether the arrival of a far more advanced civilisation could be anything but ruinous for the less advanced one. The historical analogues point the wrong way. The Columbian encounter, the Atlantic slave trade, and the colonial conquests all produced demographic collapse and cultural destruction rather than a peaceful exchange of knowledge, and the pattern is consistent enough that the danger cannot be waved away. The framework's answer is that the Great Return is built to avoid that pattern: it is voluntary rather than imposed, conditional on humanity's own readiness, mediated through a prepared institution rather than an ad-hoc landfall, and undertaken by the species' own makers rather than by strangers with no stake in its flourishing. This is offered as a genuine difference in structure, not as a guarantee — the conditions the source sets, above all the demand for demonstrated wisdom and unification, are themselves an admission that unprepared contact would be dangerous.

There is also the plain fact of an unfulfilled expectation. The 1997 message called the return "near"; nearly three decades later no Embassy has been built with the required extraterritorial status, and no arrival has occurred. The framework does not treat the imminence language as a dated prediction, since the return is conditional rather than scheduled, but it does not hide the gap either. The Embassy's construction — or its continued absence — remains the one part of the framework open to near-term test.

The location history carries real political weight. The withdrawal-of-protection message of 2015 and the shift away from Israel bear directly on the Israeli–Palestinian conflict and the contested status of the Temple Mount. The framework records these statements as part of the source material's account and takes no side in the conflict; its own reading in fact loosens the tie to the disputed ground, since the 1997 authorisation frees the Embassy to be built in any consenting nation.

See also

• Embassy
• Third Temple
• New Jerusalem
• Apocalypse
• Age of Aquarius
• Golden Age
• Elohim
• Council of the Eternals
• Yahweh
• Raëlism
• Cosmic pluralism
• Great Year
• List of prophets and religions
• Hamlet's Mill
• Jesus
• Moses
• Muhammad

External links

• Potential cultural impact of extraterrestrial contact | Wikipedia
• Messianism | Wikipedia
• Eschatology | Wikipedia
• Raëlism | Wikipedia
• International Raëlian Movement official website
• Elohim Embassy Project

References

Vorilhon, Claude (Raël). Le Livre qui dit la vérité (1974) and Les extra-terrestres m'ont emmené sur leur planète (1976), collected as Intelligent Design: Messages from the Designers (current English edition, Raëlian Foundation). [Primary source for the Great Return specification and the broader Raëlian eschatological framework.]

Vorilhon, Claude (Raël). "Message of the Elohim, December 13th, 1997." In Intelligent Design: Messages from the Designers. [The specific source for the "Great Return" designation.]

Vorilhon, Claude (Raël). "Withdrawal of the protection of Israel, August 6, 2015." Various Raëlian Movement publication venues. [The 2015 declaration on the protection-withdrawal and the shift in Embassy-location preferences.]

Sendy, Jean. La Lune, clé de la Bible. Julliard, 1968. [The principal philological-historiographic engagement with the Hebrew Bible's eschatological content in the broader neo-euhemerist tradition.]

Sendy, Jean. Ces dieux qui firent le ciel et la terre. Robert Laffont, 1969.

Biglino, Mauro. La Bibbia non è un libro sacro: Il falso letterario che ha fondato due religioni. Mondadori, 2012. [Contemporary philological engagement with the Hebrew Bible, including the eschatological content.]

Biglino, Mauro, and Giorgio Cattaneo. The Naked Bible: The Truth About the Most Famous Book in History. 2022.

Wallis, Paul. Escaping from Eden: Does Genesis Teach That the Human Race Was Created by God or Engineered by ETs? 6th Books, 2020.

Maimonides, Moses. Mishneh Torah, Hilkhot Melakhim (Laws of Kings), chapters 11-12. c. 1170-1180. [The principal medieval Jewish systematic treatment of the Mashiach and Messianic Age.]

Scholem, Gershom. The Messianic Idea in Judaism and Other Essays on Jewish Spirituality. Schocken Books, 1971. [The principal 20th-century scholarly treatment of Jewish messianism.]

Idel, Moshe. Messianic Mystics. Yale University Press, 1998.

Aaltonen, Veikko. The Second Coming of Christ: A Comprehensive Treatment. Christian Eschatology Press, 2015. [Contemporary scholarly treatment of the Christian Parousia.]

Erickson, Millard J. A Basic Guide to Eschatology: Making Sense of the Millennium. Baker Books, 1998.

Sachedina, Abdulaziz A. Islamic Messianism: The Idea of the Mahdi in Twelver Shi'ism. SUNY Press, 1981. [Standard scholarly treatment of the Mahdi tradition.]

Cook, David. Studies in Muslim Apocalyptic. Darwin Press, 2002.

Hiltebeitel, Alf. Rethinking India's Oral and Classical Epics: Draupadi among Rajputs, Muslims, and Dalits. University of Chicago Press, 1999. [Substantial treatment of Hindu eschatological tradition including Kalki.]

Kim, Jinah. "Iconography and Function of Maitreya Buddha." Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies. [Standard scholarly treatment of Maitreya.]

Boyce, Mary. Zoroastrians: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices. Routledge, 2001. [Standard scholarly introduction to Zoroastrianism including Saoshyant eschatology.]

Hultgård, Anders. "Persian Apocalypticism." In The Encyclopedia of Apocalypticism, vol. 1, edited by John J. Collins. Continuum, 1998.

Sagan, Carl. The Cosmic Connection: An Extraterrestrial Perspective. Doubleday, 1973.

Sagan, Carl. Contact. Simon & Schuster, 1985.

Webb, Stephen. If the Universe Is Teeming with Aliens... Where Is Everybody? Seventy-Five Solutions to the Fermi Paradox and the Problem of Extraterrestrial Life. 2nd ed. Springer, 2015.

Davies, Paul. The Eerie Silence: Renewing Our Search for Alien Intelligence. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2010.

Mack, John E. Passport to the Cosmos: Human Transformation and Alien Encounters. Crown, 1999. [The principal Harvard Medical School psychiatrist's engagement with the contact-experience phenomenon.]

"Great Return." Raëlian Movement official terminology and publication record.

"Embassy for the Elohim." etembassy.org and related Raëlian Movement institutional publications.

"Mashiach." Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mashiach

"Second Coming." Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Coming

"Mahdi." Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahdi

"Maitreya." Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maitreya

"Kalki." Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalki

"Saoshyant." Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saoshyant

"Eschatology." Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eschatology

"Potential cultural impact of extraterrestrial contact." Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potential_cultural_impact_of_extraterrestrial_contact

Great Return. (2026). Wheel of Heaven. https://www.wheelofheaven.world/wiki/great-return/

"Great Return." Wheel of Heaven, 2026, https://www.wheelofheaven.world/wiki/great-return/.

"Great Return." Wheel of Heaven, 2026. https://www.wheelofheaven.world/wiki/great-return/.

@misc{woh-great-return,
  author       = {{Wheel of Heaven}},
  title        = {Great Return},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://www.wheelofheaven.world/wiki/great-return/}},
  note         = {CC0-1.0 public domain}
}