Four Levels

The Four Levels are the Raëlian rule for weighing any situation — against infinity, against the Elohim who created us, against human society, and against the individual self, with love as the constant across all four.

Four Levels is the name the Wheel of Heaven corpus gives to a rule stated by Yahweh in the Raëlian source texts: that any situation should be weighed against four frames of reference at once — infinity, the Elohim who created us, human society, and the individual self. The rule first appears in the "Humanity" section of "The Keys," in Extra-Terrestrials Took Me to Their Planet (1975):

In every situation, we must always consider things in regard to four levels: in relation to infinity; in relation to the Elohim, our parents and creators; in relation to human society; and finally, in relation to the individual.

The same passage fixes the framework's two organising principles. One level carries more weight than the others — "the most important level is that relating to infinity, for it is in relation to this level that all things must be judged" — yet the judgement is never made on that level alone. It is made "with one constant factor: love." The Four Levels are therefore not a ladder on which the higher rung overrules the lower, but four angles held together, with love running through all of them. Where the broader Raëlian cosmology — infinity, fractal cosmology, the living Earth — describes what the universe is, the Four Levels describe how a person is meant to act inside it.

The four levels

Level one: the Infinite. Measured against infinity, a human life is nothing. The FAQ passage in Message from the Designers puts it without softening: "Our life means nothing when compared with the Infinite. If we die, if all of humanity disappears, it will not change anything in the Infinity of time or space." Nothing we do registers on the cosmic scale. The framework reads this as a release rather than a defeat: because the cosmos does not depend on us, we are freed from the impossible weight of cosmic responsibility and can act at our own scale. The posture at this level is harmony with the infinitely large and the infinitely small, not a pretence of cosmic importance.

Level two: the Elohim. Against infinity we are nothing; against our makers we are not. "In relation to the Elohim, our life is very important, because we are their children." The Elohim are the specific, finite beings who created humanity, and our actions matter to them the way a creation matters to those who made it and are watching what it becomes. This is the level of accountability — of taking the creators' guidance into account and acting so that human society hears it — and of the pride the source attaches to being "created in their image": conscious of infinity, and one day able to create life in turn. That last clause ties the level to the cosmic chain, the corpus's picture of creators who were themselves created by earlier creators.

Level three: human society. A life is also part of a collective longer than itself. The source calls each person a cell "of this huge being that is Humanity," heir to "a long list of survivors who have escaped the epidemics and wars." At this level a life matters because it contributes to a shared trajectory — the "cells of Humanity" image reaching straight into the living Earth framework, where humanity is itself an organism-like whole. The reading of Level three is critical rather than conformist: society "must be taken into account" but "should not be followed," and is instead to be helped "to emerge from its primitive straitjacket by regular questioning of all its habits and traditions." Belonging, here, carries the duty to improve what one belongs to.

Level four: the individual self. Finally, "in relation to our own self, our life has only the importance that we give it." This is the level of personal meaning: the significance of a life is not handed down from the cosmos but chosen by the one living it. The source treats fulfilment as a precondition rather than a reward — "it is impossible to harmonize yourself with infinity and become a new man if you are not fulfilled." Without a fulfilled individual at Level four, the other three levels have no one to act through.

The order in which the source lists the levels runs from the largest frame inward — cosmos, creators, community, self — but the last level loops back to the first. Fulfilment at Level four is the very thing that makes harmony with infinity at Level one possible, so the framework is a circle rather than a descending scale: the cosmic perspective that opens the list is reached, in the end, only through the individual life that closes it. The list is also meant as complete rather than illustrative — the four levels are offered as the whole set of frames a decision has to answer to, not a sample of a longer one.

The Wheel of Heaven reading

The corpus takes the four-level list as stated and reads it as a single working instrument. This systematic reading — as opposed to the bare list — is where the corpus develops the source rather than merely quoting it.

Its central claim is that the four levels correct one another. Each, taken alone, fails in a predictable direction, and each is the antidote to a neighbour's failure. The Infinite alone collapses into nihilism — if nothing matters cosmically, nothing matters at all — so the Elohim level answers it with a concrete addressee for whom our actions do matter. The Elohim level alone could harden into deference, so the individual level insists that meaning is finally self-assigned. The individual level alone slides into solipsism, which the society level checks by placing the self inside a collective project. And the society level alone invites conformity or collective tyranny, which the Infinite level checks by reminding every human institution of its own smallness. Held together, the four keep one another honest.

What holds them together is love — not one of the levels but the constant across them, changing shape at each. At the Infinite level it is the recognition that "we must live in harmony with others, because they are a part of infinity as well": cosmic harmony reached through people rather than around them. At the Elohim level it is the wish "to transmit your message of love to the Elohim." At the level of society it is engagement with the human project rather than mere obligation to it; at the level of the self it is care for one's own development. The source's meditative instruction gathers all four into one practice: "Place yourself in harmony with the infinitely large and with the infinitely small by radiating love towards what is above and towards what is below, and by being conscious that you yourself are part of infinity" — then turning that same love toward the Elohim and toward the world around you.

This is why the framework insists the levels are held at once rather than ranked and resolved. Infinity is the most important reference point — it is where "all things must be judged" — but its importance is orienting, not overriding. A decision that satisfied only the cosmic frame while ignoring the creators, the community, or the self would, on this reading, be a failure of the framework rather than an application of it. The Four Levels are the practical face of the corpus's cosmology: the infinity and living Earth entries describe a universe of nested scales and living wholes, and the Four Levels are the orientation a person adopts to live well among them.

Comparative frameworks

Multi-level ethical schemes recur across many traditions, and the resemblances are worth noting so long as the differences are kept in view — the parallels are structural, and each tradition means something of its own.

The Hindu puruṣārthas — dharma, artha, kama, and moksha — name four legitimate aims of a human life and ask that they be pursued in balance. The likeness to the Four Levels is real at the level of four-fold integration, but the purusharthas are goals one pursues where the Four Levels are angles from which one judges, and they carry a doctrine of liberation from rebirth that the Raëlian framework does not share. The Stoic circles of concern, articulated by Hierocles, arrange ethical regard in rings widening from the self outward to all rational beings; this is an expanding scope rather than a set of simultaneous frames, and its cosmic term is the providential logos rather than embodied creators. The Buddhist brahmavihāras — loving-kindness, compassion, sympathetic joy, and equanimity — offer the closest parallel to the love-as-constant principle, since they too place a form of love at the centre of practice, though they are cultivated states rather than levels of judgement. The Christian tradition's four loves (storge, philia, eros, agape) and the Islamic sequence of islam, iman, and ihsan likewise grade ethical and spiritual life, and Sufi accounts of the maqāmāt stage it as a path of stations.

The framework's own contribution within this landscape is easy to state. Its levels are grounded in a specific cosmology — the nested scales of the infinity and fractal cosmology entries — rather than asserted on traditional authority; they are meant to be held at once rather than climbed; love runs through all of them rather than crowning one; and the second level has no counterpart in the secular schemes, because it answers to the Elohim as finite makers rather than to an abstract divine principle. Set against a bleaker reading of the same cosmic scale — the Lovecraftian view in which human insignificance yields only dread — the Four Levels put the identical fact to opposite use: the vastness that dwarfs us is, at the first level, precisely what frees us to act.

See also

References

Vorilhon, Claude (Raël). The Book Which Tells the Truth (1974); collected in Message from the Designers.

Vorilhon, Claude (Raël). Extra-Terrestrials Took Me to Their Planet (1975); collected in Message from the Designers. The "Humanity" section of "The Keys" is the principal source for the Four Levels framework's specific content.

Vorilhon, Claude (Raël). Let's Welcome the Extra-terrestrials (1979); collected in Message from the Designers. The "What is the Purpose of Life?" FAQ section provides substantial level-by-level articulation.

Vorilhon, Claude (Raël). Message from the Designers. Tagman Press, 2005.

Sendy, Jean. Ces dieux qui firent le ciel et la terre. Robert Laffont, 1969.

Sendy, Jean. L'ère du Verseau. Robert Laffont, 1970.

Biglino, Mauro, and Giorgio Cattaneo. The Naked Bible: The Truth About the Most Famous Book in History. Uno, 2022.

Wallis, Paul Anthony. The Eden Conspiracy. 6th Books, 2024.

Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Harvard University Press, 1989.

Taylor, Charles. A Secular Age. Harvard University Press, 2007.

Murdoch, Iris. The Sovereignty of Good. Routledge, 1970.

Murdoch, Iris. Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals. Allen Lane, 1992.

Berlin, Isaiah. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford University Press, 1969.

Berlin, Isaiah. The Crooked Timber of Humanity. John Murray, 1990.

Kekes, John. The Morality of Pluralism. Princeton University Press, 1993.

Raz, Joseph. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford University Press, 1986.

Nagel, Thomas. The View from Nowhere. Oxford University Press, 1986.

Nagel, Thomas. Mortal Questions. Cambridge University Press, 1979.

Russell, Bertrand. "A Free Man's Worship" (1903). In Mysticism and Logic. Longmans, Green & Co., 1917.

Naess, Arne. Ecology, Community and Lifestyle. Cambridge University Press, 1989.

Devall, Bill, and George Sessions. Deep Ecology: Living as if Nature Mattered. Gibbs Smith, 1985.

Fox, Warwick. Toward a Transpersonal Ecology: Developing New Foundations for Environmentalism. Shambhala, 1990.

Singer, Peter. The Expanding Circle: Ethics, Evolution, and Moral Progress. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1981; revised edition Princeton University Press, 2011.

Ord, Toby. The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity. Hachette, 2020.

MacAskill, William. What We Owe the Future. Basic Books, 2022.

Wolf, Susan. Meaning in Life and Why It Matters. Princeton University Press, 2010.

Metz, Thaddeus. Meaning in Life: An Analytic Study. Oxford University Press, 2013.

Landau, Iddo. Finding Meaning in an Imperfect World. Oxford University Press, 2017.

Wilber, Ken. A Brief History of Everything. Shambhala, 1996.

Lewis, C. S. The Four Loves. Geoffrey Bles, 1960.

Doniger, Wendy. The Hindus: An Alternative History. Penguin Press, 2009.

Olivelle, Patrick, trans. The Early Upaniṣads: Annotated Text and Translation. Oxford University Press, 1998.

Bilimoria, Purushottama, ed. Indian Ethics. Routledge, 2007.

Bodhi, Bhikkhu. In the Buddha's Words: An Anthology of Discourses from the Pāli Canon. Wisdom Publications, 2005.

Williams, Paul. Mahāyāna Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations. Routledge, 2nd ed., 2008.

Buswell, Robert E., Jr., and Donald S. Lopez Jr. The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism. Princeton University Press, 2014.

Long, A. A., and D. N. Sedley. The Hellenistic Philosophers. 2 vols. Cambridge University Press, 1987.

Hierocles. Hierocles the Stoic: Elements of Ethics, Fragments, and Excerpts. Trans. Ilaria Ramelli and David Konstan. Society of Biblical Literature, 2009.

Tu, Wei-ming. Confucian Thought: Selfhood as Creative Transformation. SUNY Press, 1985.

de Bary, Wm. Theodore, and Irene Bloom, comps. Sources of Chinese Tradition. 2 vols. Columbia University Press, 1999-2000.

Chittick, William C. The Sufi Path of Knowledge: Ibn al-'Arabi's Metaphysics of Imagination. SUNY Press, 1989.

Schimmel, Annemarie. Mystical Dimensions of Islam. University of North Carolina Press, 1975.

Kohn, Livia, ed. Daoism Handbook. Brill, 2000.

Tutu, Desmond. No Future Without Forgiveness. Doubleday, 1999. (For Ubuntu philosophy)

International Raëlian Movement. https://www.rael.org

"Purusharthas." Encyclopaedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/purusartha

"Brahmavihara." Encyclopaedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/brahmavihara

"Stoicism." Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/stoicism/

Cite this page
APA
Four Levels. (2026). Wheel of Heaven. https://www.wheelofheaven.world/wiki/four-levels/
MLA
"Four Levels." Wheel of Heaven, 2026, https://www.wheelofheaven.world/wiki/four-levels/.
Chicago
"Four Levels." Wheel of Heaven, 2026. https://www.wheelofheaven.world/wiki/four-levels/.
BibTeX
@misc{woh-four-levels,
  author       = {{Wheel of Heaven}},
  title        = {Four Levels},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://www.wheelofheaven.world/wiki/four-levels/}},
  note         = {CC0-1.0 public domain}
}